Deutsche Bank sees an “EMU Trap”

by Sebastian Dullien

In this week’s business cycle outlook from Deutsche Bank Global Markets ("Konjunktur und Märkte", June 23, www.db-rbf.de for DB customers), Thomas Mayer warns that some countries might have fallen in what he calls an "EMU Trap": According to his analysis, countries which have strong labour cost increases might fall into a position in which growth is slowing because competitiveness has badly deteriorated. With growth slowing, tax revenues are falling and outlays for unemployment are increasing, leading to a bigger budget deficit. In this position, a country cannot do much anymore: Cutting the deficit further would lead to even slower growth while there is no possibility to improve competitiveness quickly.

Thomas Mayer sees Portugal and Italy already in the EMU trap and Greece and Spain in imminent danger of falling into this trap. Thomas portraits three possible consequences from the EMU trap: First, a country could cut its production costs. Second, it could leave EMU. Third, it could pressure the ECB to allow for a higher rate of inflation in the whole union.

According to Thomas, it is highly unlikely that a single country would leave EMU in order to improve its competitiveness, given that a depreciation would increase the debt burden. However, he believes that countries in the EMU trap could pressure the ECB to accommodate a higher rate of inflation. This, he argues, might lead to stability-oriented countries to leave EMU at some future date.

One might question whether really the southern Europeans will manage to push Trichet, Stark and their team into allowing higher inflation in the Euro-zone as much as whether Germany would really leave EMU and accept a strong appreciation of a newly introduced German Mark just because inflation is running slightly above two percent. However, it is interesting that after Joachim Fels from Morgan Stanley and Véronique Riches-Flores from the Société Générale now Deutsche Bank is also thinking about scenarios of an unravelling of EMU.

Comments

  1. December 16th, 2006 | 3:04 pm

    Does this mean there is a case for a Eurozone-wide redistribution policy, over and above the European Union’s existing Cohesion and Structural funds?

  2. Sebastian Dullien
    December 18th, 2006 | 4:18 pm

    Daniela and me are advocating a pan-European unemployment insurance and a pan-European corporate tax. However, I would put the emphasis on stabilisation, not redistribution. James Galbraith, in contrast, favors redistribution. You can find his paper and my reply on the homepage of the Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.

  3. September 18th, 2007 | 12:15 pm

    [...] Eichengreen first draws a distinction between the different motivations behind a possible exit from EMU: First, there might be an incentive that stability-oriented countries like Germany might leave EMU as the inflation rate achieved for EMU as a whole is too high for their taste (a scenario which was first invented by Deutsche Bank’s Thomas Mayer and marked the first post on Eurozone Watch a little more than a year ago). Second, there might be countries like Italy and Portugal which have lost competitiveness to such a degree that they have an incentive to use a depreciation to gain competitiveness and get themselves back to full employment. [...]

  4. Ugo
    May 1st, 2008 | 8:33 pm

    Terrible news for the Greek friends (who by their own admission cheated their way into the EMU)…
    Hope their economy -mainly based on tourism, fisheries and fruit picking does not badly collapse

Leave a reply

Anti-Spam Quiz: